Skip to content

Case Studies

Deep Drawn Aluminum Cylinders

The Problem

A Tripar customer had been buying a deep spun aluminum cylinder (5” diameter, up to 11” long, closed at one end) for approx. $10-$14 each.

Having it spun using the same supplier for years, they were pleased with the product believing that spinning was the most cost effective and the best manufacturing process for this part. The last time they placed a replenishment order, their worst fear was realized; their longstanding supplier had shut down, and without warning! Having worked with Tripar for many years and knowing that one of our many manufacturing processes was deep drawing, they reached out to us to see if this cylinder could be produced this way.

The Solution

Our Engineers analyzed the geometry and material properties of the aluminum required, and determined that making a part with a depth to diameter ratio of over 2:1 would have to be done in 3 draws; a primary drawing operation, followed by two successive redrawing operations, each reducing the diameter and increasing the part’s length to the final requirements.

Having over 1500 dies, over 200 of which are draw and deep draw dies, two were found that could serve for the first two operations without any die modification whatsoever. This allowed us to quote our customer very competitive unit prices at various quantities, with only one die cost; that which was needed for the third and final redraw operation.

The Result

 The net result was the customer obtaining deep drawn parts made to their specifications with many advantages:

– approximately half the price of having it spun
– paying less than $8000 tooling
– having a much-improved surface finish over spinning, eliminating any need to polish the part to remove spinning marks, saving even more money
– having much greater dimensional stability; a significant advantage given the customer’s need to insert a custom plastic injection molded piece into the open end

Since then, Tripar has reliably produced over 30,000 of these parts to their customer’s complete satisfaction. 

Fabrication of this item may be seen at the following video, at time interval 0.22-0.36!

[rev_slider alias=”cta-contact”]

Continue Reading

You also may be interested in the following articles

Case Study: The Benefits of Tripar UL1598 Standard Assemblies

A customer of Tripar had been buying the Reduced Airflow IC Box, but discovered that it did not meet the maximum airflow requirements of a state specification.
Read Article

Reshoring back to Tripar

Tripar recently received an RFQ from a US based OEM for 20,000 of its 1287 bar hangers. A quote was provided, and we received a P.O. - nothing unusual but
Read Article

Case Study: Ultra-Airtight IC Boxes & Plaster Frames

A customer of Tripar had been buying the Reduced Airflow IC Box, but discovered that it did not meet the maximum airflow requirements of a state specification.
Read Article

Looking for specific information or need a custom product built?

Contact us today and one of our representatives will get back to you with a free quote.